What it studies
Reported psi phenomena and anomalous experiences: extrasensory perception, psychokinesis, apparitions, mediumship, near death experiences, out of body experiences, and possible survival of consciousness after death.
Adam Hinds — Field Reference — Psychical Research & Anomalous Experience
Telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, psychokinesis, mediumship, apparitions,
near death experiences, survival research, and consciousness.
This page does not ask you to believe everything. It asks you to separate experience, interpretation, evidence, fraud, error, culture, psychology, and possible anomaly. That is slower than yelling “proof” on the internet. It also works better.
Parapsychology is not the same thing as ghost hunting. That distinction matters.
Reported psi phenomena and anomalous experiences: extrasensory perception, psychokinesis, apparitions, mediumship, near death experiences, out of body experiences, and possible survival of consciousness after death.
Not automatic proof of spirits, demons, aliens, magic, or religion. Those are interpretations. The raw data are reports, observations, measurements, histories, experiments, and patterns.
Respect the witness. Question the claim. Preserve the record. Test ordinary causes. Keep the mystery if mystery remains. Do not inflate it to sell a podcast.
Parapsychology and spirituality overlap when unusual experiences raise questions about consciousness, death, meaning, prayer, mysticism, and the unseen structure of reality. They are not the same thing. Spirituality asks what an experience means. Parapsychology asks what happened, how we know, and whether the claim survives disciplined scrutiny.
For the broader religious and philosophical side, see the companion page: Spirituality, perennial wisdom, and independent religious thought.
Learn the vocabulary before arguing with anyone. Precision costs nothing. Imprecision costs everything.
A neutral label for claimed anomalous information transfer or mind-matter interaction. Avoids declaring the mechanism before we know it.
Claimed information acquisition beyond known sensory channels. Includes telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, and remote viewing.
Claimed influence of mind or intention on physical systems. Modern research focuses on random number generators rather than bent spoons.
Research into whether some aspect of consciousness continues after death. Covers mediumship, apparitions, deathbed visions, reincarnation cases, and NDEs.
Claimed direct communication between minds without ordinary sensory contact. Experiments often use sender and receiver designs.
Claimed perception of a hidden or distant target without ordinary access. Remote viewing is a structured version of this claim.
Claimed knowledge of future events not inferable from present information. Difficult because it challenges ordinary causation.
Reports of seeing or sensing persons, animals, or presences not physically present. May involve grief, place memory, sleep states, crisis events, or unknown factors.
Not all evidence is the same. Some categories have decades of experiments. Some are mostly case reports. Some are cultural noise wearing a bedsheet.
The United States funded and evaluated remote viewing programs for intelligence purposes. The historical record is important because it shows both serious official interest and the practical problem: information that looks intriguing in a lab is not automatically useful in operations.
Daryl Bem's 2011 paper brought precognition claims into mainstream psychology debate. It also became a major example in the replication crisis. That is useful even if you doubt psi, because weak methods and publication bias do not become harmless just because the topic is strange.
Good parapsychology looks boring from the outside. Controls, blinding, statistics, logs, null results, and patience. The fun stuff comes later, if it survives.
A person cannot leak information they do not have. Good protocols isolate the claimant, the sitter, the experimenter, the judge, and the target material where possible.
Target pools must be large enough, randomized, and protected from sensory leakage. A sloppy target pool can manufacture hits through chance and ambiguity.
A statistically significant result can still be small, fragile, or useless. Ask about effect size, confidence intervals, replication, and preregistration.
Write it down before interpretation. Memory edits itself. It does not ask permission.
The central criticism of parapsychology is replication. Any serious claim should welcome independent replication under improved controls.
Grief, trauma, fear, and religious conviction are not lab toys. Protect witnesses. Do not exploit vulnerable people for content.
For home cases, haunt reports, unusual experiences, crisis apparitions, object movement claims, and similar fieldwork. Keep it clean.
Any serious parapsychology field guide should include Loyd Auerbach and the Office of Paranormal Investigations. Auerbach's work is useful because it does not treat field investigation as entertainment first. It treats hauntings, apparitions, poltergeists, witnesses, and evidence as casework.
Start with Auerbach's books, especially ESP, Hauntings and Poltergeists and Hauntings & Poltergeists.
The field has lanes. Learn all of them. Knowing only one produces partisans, not researchers.
The older tradition: apparitions, mediumship, telepathy, crisis cases, hauntings, and survival questions. The Society for Psychical Research is the historic anchor.
Controlled tests of telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, psychokinesis, random event generators, forced-choice tasks, and ganzfeld designs.
Practical investigation of hauntings, apparitions, poltergeists, witnesses, and physical settings. This is where Loyd Auerbach and OPI belong.
Mediumship, near death experiences, deathbed visions, reincarnation cases, and apparitions. This lane overlaps most directly with spirituality.
The philosophical side: whether consciousness is produced by the brain, transmitted through it, or something more fundamental. The hard problem is still hard.
Skepticism should test claims, not perform smugness. The best skeptical work finds errors, fraud, and weak controls while still taking witnesses seriously.
Not a sainthood list. Some are advocates, some are critics, some changed the field by making everyone argue harder about method.
Philosopher and psychologist who took psychical research seriously while keeping a careful, pragmatic frame. Essential for anyone studying religion, experience, and consciousness.
Central figure in early psychical research and author of Human Personality and Its Survival of Bodily Death.
Brought experimental parapsychology into the modern laboratory at Duke University through card guessing and statistical ESP work.
Parapsychologist, investigator, educator, Director of OPI. One of the clearest bridges between formal parapsychology and practical haunt casework.
Important for spontaneous case collections and the study of everyday psi reports, not just laboratory trials.
Statistician known for serious analysis of psi data, including remote viewing and replication debates.
Major figure in ganzfeld research and the automated protocols designed to answer earlier criticism.
Researcher and author associated with experimental psi, meta-analysis, and consciousness research. Read critically.
Windbridge researcher known for controlled mediumship protocols and applied research around grief.
Psychiatrist and near death experience researcher, known for the Greyson NDE Scale and clinical studies.
University of Virginia psychiatrist known for investigating children who reported previous life memories. Foundational and dense.
Continued child past-life memory research at the University of Virginia Division of Perceptual Studies.
Psychologist and critic of parapsychology. Read critics directly. It keeps your work honest.
Thorsen Professor of Psychology at Lund University, director of CERCAP, and editor of the Journal of Parapsychology. His 2018 review of the experimental evidence for psi in American Psychologist is one of the more rigorous recent attempts to summarize the state of the research.
Started as a believer, earned a PhD in parapsychology, ran her own experiments for years, found no evidence, and became one of the field's most thoughtful critics. Her trajectory is more useful than most of the debates she walked away from.
Biologist and former Royal Society Research Fellow known for morphic resonance and practical telepathy experiments with animals and people. His work is contested by mainstream science, and worth reading for that reason as much as any other.
Start with primary sources and serious surveys. Avoid books that mistake confidence for evidence. There are many of those.
Use these before wandering into content farms, breathless YouTube channels, or someone selling a $900 spirit certification with a stock photo owl.
The best general reference for psychical research topics, figures, historical cases, and technical concepts.
Visit Psi Encyclopedia →Founded in 1882. Historic center of scholarly psychical research. Key source for serious study.
Visit SPR →International professional organization for scientists and scholars studying psi phenomena.
Visit the PA →Research, education, courses, lectures, and the Journal of Parapsychology tradition.
Visit Rhine →Founded by Loyd Auerbach. Hauntings, apparitions, poltergeists, case consultation, and applied field parapsychology.
Visit OPI →Controlled mediumship research, grief application research, and research medium screening.
Visit Windbridge →Online courses in parapsychology, investigation, altered states, research methods, and related fields.
Visit Rhine Education →Declassified government material on remote viewing and related programs. Read primary documents.
Search CIA Reading Room →Division of Perceptual Studies, known for near death experiences, past-life memory research, and survival questions.
Visit UVA DOPS →Bad believers and bad skeptics share the same disease: they already know the answer. The symptoms differ. The disease does not.
Short definitions for fast use. If a term matters to the case, research it deeper before using it in a report.
A sane route through the subject. Not glamorous. Glamour is how nonsense gets a mortgage.
This page belongs in the larger adamhinds.net field guide network.